The Hiring Intelligence Platform for Modern Teams

An ocean of applicants.
One clear decision.

Sagar means ocean — and that is what a single open role now sends you. HireSagar reads every resume the way your best recruiter would, scores it against the role, and tells you exactly what to ask — then shows you the evidence behind every score. Explainable. Deterministic. Auditable.

Interactive demo, no login Analyze a resume free 7-day full trial No credit card required
0
full analysis turnaround
0
intelligence modules
0
auditable decisions

From upload to interview in 60 seconds

Upload a resume and a job description. HireSagar does the rest — instantly, explainably, consistently.

1

Upload the resume

PDF or DOCX. Every signal — dates, companies, skills, gaps — is extracted by rule, not inference. The same document always reads the same way.

2

The intelligence engine reads it

Validation, profile extraction, timeline reconstruction, skill depth, scoring evidence, JD alignment, hiring intelligence and career insight — run in parallel, complete in ~30 seconds.

3

Recruiter gets the full picture

Score, evidence, risk flags, career trajectory, and 12–15 candidate-specific interview questions. Make the call with confidence.

No other ATS does this

Every feature below is live, tested, and running in production — not a roadmap promise.

🔬

Resume Intelligence

4-tier skill classification (practical / listed / related / missing), experience year calculation cross-checked against actual timeline dates, location extraction, and achievement parsing.

Deterministic + reasoning
🕐

Timeline Analysis

Finds every employment gap (≥2 months), detects timeline overlaps, calculates average tenure, flags frequent switchers, and gives each gap a risk level with a likely reason.

Deterministic + reasoning
🛡

Experience Consistency

Compares claimed experience against computed experience. Flags impossible overlaps, technology-age mismatches, and experience inflation — before they waste your time in an interview.

Deterministic
📊

Hiring Intelligence

Synthesises all 7 prior intelligence modules into a single structured hiring recommendation with evidence. Not a black box — every score traces to a specific resume passage.

Reasoning
🎯

Candidate-Specific Interview Questions

12–15 questions that reference this candidate’s actual companies, projects, claimed metrics, and detected gaps. Two candidates applying to the same role never get the same questions.

Reasoning
📈

Career Insight

Promotion velocity, leadership evolution, career direction clarity, business impact quality, and learning velocity — across all industries from tech to healthcare to government.

Reasoning
🧠

Recruiter Learning Engine

When a recruiter corrects a skill classification, that correction is stored and applied to every future candidate at their organisation. The system gets smarter with use.

Deterministic — no black-box ML

JD-Resume Alignment

Semantic alignment scoring between the job description and the resume — not keyword matching. Detects conflicts, gaps, and misrepresentations that keyword ATS systems miss entirely.

Deterministic + reasoning

What recruiters actually see

Real output from a real resume upload. Every field is grounded in evidence — not generated narrative.

Hiring Intelligence Report

The hiring intelligence module synthesises every prior stage into a final verdict with evidence, risks, and a recommendation that explains itself.

  • Overall score derived from 7 weighted dimensions, not a single heuristic
  • Every risk flag linked to specific resume evidence, not a guess
  • Recommendation calibrated to the candidate’s level and the role’s requirements
  • Career trajectory covers promotion velocity, growth signals, and ownership depth
Candidate Intelligence — Ananya R.
87
✓ 7 yrs experience verified ✓ Java Spring — hands-on evidence → Microservices — listed, depth unclear ⚠ Kubernetes — not found
Risk Assessment
Timeline: No significant gaps
Skill claim: Docker listed, no evidence
Experience: Computed matches claimed
Career: Steady progression, 3 promotions
RECOMMENDATION
Strong candidate. Advance to technical round. Probe Docker and microservices depth.

vs. Every other ATS

Other platforms track candidates. HireSagar evaluates them.

Capability HireSagar Greenhouse Lever Workable Manatal
Pipeline management
Skill-gap analysis, 4-tier with evidence Keyword only Basic
Experience consistency check
Employment timeline intelligence
Candidate-specific interview questions Generic templates
Auditable scoring (evidence trail)
Recruiter learning engine
Career trajectory insight
Starting price ₹7,999/mo ~₹51,981/mo ~₹37,805/mo ₹17,863/mo ₹1,796/seat

Every score traces back
to a line on the resume

Hiring decisions that can't be explained can't be defended. HireSagar scores candidates with a deterministic intelligence engine — dates, tenure, skill evidence, and gaps are read from the document itself with rules you can inspect, not guessed by a model. Open any score and you see the exact reasoning and the passage behind it.

  • Skill evidence graded: demonstrated in real work vs merely listed
  • Employment months summed role by role — gaps never counted as tenure
  • Timeline gaps, overlaps and tenure patterns surfaced with dates
  • Every requirement shown as matched, related, listed, or missing
  • Same inputs, same output — every time, for every candidate
Score breakdown Deterministic · no model call
Kubernetes Demonstrated “deployed 40+ microservices on EKS”
Terraform Demonstrated “authored IaC modules for 3 environments”
PostgreSQL Listed only named in Skills — no supporting work found
Kafka Related evidence RabbitMQ experience found instead
Go Missing no mention anywhere in the document
Required match 68/100 2 demonstrated · 1 listed · 1 related · 1 missing

An explainable hiring
intelligence engine

Not a chatbot. Sagar helps recruiters make faster, more confident hiring decisions — every answer grounded in your real candidates, interviews and pipeline, with the evidence and reasoning shown. When a rule or your own data can answer, it answers instantly and for free; it reaches for a model only when judgment is genuinely required.

  • Who are my top candidates for the Senior Backend role?
  • Which candidates have timeline gaps I should ask about?
  • Compare my two finalists and give me a recommendation
  • Why did the AI flag this candidate as high risk?
  • Who should I prioritize interviewing this week?
Try Sagar free →
Sagar Hiring Intelligence Engine · grounded in your data
Compare Rahul and Priya for the Lead Engineer role
Rahul scores 84 with strong backend skills — 7 of 8 required skills matched, low risk, 4 years relevant tenure.

Priya scores 79 — slightly stronger system design, but a 14-month gap between 2022–2023 flagged as medium risk.

Recommendation: Rahul edges ahead on overall fit. I'd lead with system design questions for Priya to address the gap.

No borrowed logos.
Just verifiable engineering.

We're a young product and we won't fake social proof. What we can show you is how seriously the platform is built — every number below is real.

2,100+
Automated tests
API, billing, chaos & security suites run on every commit
125
API routes security-audited
Full RBAC + billing guard matrix, re-verified each release
8
Provider-abstracted subsystems
Billing, storage, email, AI, cache, rate-limiting, queue & monitoring are swappable
0
Fabricated numbers
Every metric in the product is computed from your real data

Built for security
from day one

Your candidate data never leaves your isolated tenant. Every access is logged. You stay in full control.

🔒
Tenant data isolation
Every organization's data is fully isolated — no shared tables, no cross-org leakage.
🗑️
GDPR Right to Erasure
One-click candidate anonymisation. Full data export on request. Compliant by design.
📋
Immutable audit logs
Every action logged with actor, timestamp, and before/after state. Nothing is hidden.
🤖
AI Zero Data Retention
Resume data sent to Anthropic is processed under Zero Data Retention — not stored, not trained on.
SOC 2-Ready
Architecture, not yet audited
GDPR-Aligned
By design
RBAC
Role-based access
Audit Trail
90-day retention
Session Auth
Server-side only
ZDR Claude
No AI training

Simple, predictable pricing

Start free. Upgrade when you’re ready. No hidden fees.

Free
Free
0/mo
free forever

1 team seat
1 active job
10 resumes / mo
12 Intelligence Operations / mo
Full deterministic engine on every resume
1 scheduled interview / mo
No credit card required
Start free →
Starter
Starter
7,999/mo
billed monthly

2 team seats
3 active jobs
200 resumes / mo
800 Intelligence Operations / mo
Full intelligence engine + deep candidate analysis
10 scheduled interviews / mo
Core hiring analytics
Get started →
Business
Business
49,999/mo
billed monthly

25 team seats
50 active jobs
5,000 resumes / mo
12,000 Intelligence Operations / mo
500 scheduled interviews / mo
Advanced analytics
Webhooks + full API access
Audit logs + CSV export
Priority support
Get started →
Enterprise
Enterprise
99,999/mo
billed monthly

100 team seats
200 active jobs
20,000 resumes / mo
40,000 Intelligence Operations / mo
White-label platform
AI spend-cap controls
Audit logs + CSV export
Webhooks + full API access
Priority support
Get started →

Free forever on the Free plan — no credit card. Paid plans start with a 7-day free trial.

What a hiring intelligence platform actually does

A short, honest primer on the difference between tracking candidates and evaluating them — and where each belongs in modern recruitment.

Where an applicant tracking system stops

An applicant tracking system is a system of record. It stores candidates, moves them through stages, keeps hiring organised, and leaves an audit trail. That work matters, and HireSagar does all of it — per-job pipelines you configure yourself, full stage history, team collaboration, and a record of who changed what and when.

But an ATS answers where is this candidate? It does not answer is this candidate right for this role? That question still lands on a person reading resumes at speed, and that is exactly where consistency breaks down. Two recruiters rank the same shortlist differently. The same recruiter ranks it differently on a Friday afternoon than on a Monday morning. Nothing in a traditional ATS notices, because evaluation was never its job.

What hiring intelligence adds

Hiring intelligence is the layer that evaluates rather than tracks. HireSagar reads every resume against the specific role it was submitted for and returns three things together: a score, the evidence behind that score, and the reasoning that connects them. The evidence is the part that matters. A number with no explanation is a black box, and a black box is not something you can defend to a hiring manager — or to a candidate who asks why they were passed over.

The foundation is deterministic. Resume parsing, skill extraction, experience calculation, timeline reconstruction and resume scoring run as explicit rules, not as a language model guessing. The same document always produces the same result, every score traces back to a specific passage, and nothing is invented. Model-backed reasoning is layered on top of those facts for the genuinely judgement-shaped questions — never underneath them.

Screening, evaluation, and the interview

Resume screening is where volume hurts most: a few hundred applicants against one role, most of them plausible on paper. HireSagar grades the evidence for each requirement the job actually states — demonstrated, claimed, adjacent, or absent — so a shortlist is built from what a resume proves rather than which keywords it happens to repeat. Career timelines are reconstructed and cross-checked, so gaps, overlaps and inflated tenure surface before they cost you an interview slot.

Candidate evaluation continues past the shortlist. Interview management keeps scheduling, structured scorecards and feedback attached to the candidate record instead of scattered across calendars and inboxes, and generated interview questions reference that candidate's real companies, projects and detected gaps — so two people applying for the same role are never asked the same generic five questions. Assessment workflows cover the skills a conversation cannot verify, with results landing on the same record as everything else.

Why explainability is the thing to insist on

Screening tools are easy to demo and hard to trust. The question worth asking any vendor is not how accurate the model is, but whether the product can show its working. If a tool cannot point at the line in the document that produced a score, you cannot audit it, you cannot correct it, and you cannot explain a rejection to anyone who asks — which in several jurisdictions is not merely awkward but a compliance problem.

That constraint is why the HireSagar engine is deterministic first. Rules can be inspected, tested and reproduced; a probabilistic guess cannot. It also means the analysis behaves the same whether you run one resume or ten thousand, and that a score never quietly changes because a model was updated underneath you. Your hiring data stays yours and is exportable at any time, and candidate data is never used to train AI models without your explicit consent.

Analytics, automation, and knowing whether it worked

Hiring analytics closes the loop: time-in-stage, conversion between stages, source quality, pipeline health, and whether your scoring actually correlates with the people you go on to hire. Recruitment automation handles the mechanical parts around it — stage-triggered emails, scheduling, reminders, bulk actions — so automation removes busywork rather than removing judgement.

You can see the deterministic engine before creating an account. The free hiring intelligence tools run the same analysis on a single document with no signup, the interactive demo walks a full recruiter workspace on sample data, and the blog goes deeper on screening, evaluation and hiring metrics. When you are ready to compare tiers, pricing is public, and the FAQ answers the specifics on data ownership, security and how scores are derived.

Common questions

Most ATS tools track where candidates are in your pipeline. HireSagar evaluates them. Experience consistency checks, timeline gap analysis, skill depth verification, JD alignment scoring and career trajectory analysis all run deterministically — the same resume always produces the same result, and every number traces back to a line in the document. A model is used for one thing only: turning those established facts into candidate-specific interview questions and written analysis.
Every score is auditable. Every recommendation links back to specific resume passages — the exact line that produced it. Facts come first: dates, durations, skills and gaps are computed deterministically, so the same document always produces the same answer and nothing is inferred where evidence is missing. Where a conclusion is uncertain, the report says so rather than guessing, and confidence is reported separately from the score — a high score with thin evidence is shown as exactly that.
Nothing per resume, in operations. The deterministic engine — parsing, skill-evidence grading, fit scoring, ranking, timeline and risk analysis — is included in every plan; the only limit on it is your monthly resume allowance. Intelligence Operations are spent on the deeper work: 15 for a full deep-analysis of a resume, 2 for a generated interview-question set, and 1 for a generated job description. Reading back anything already computed is always free, and duplicate uploads are served from cache. Every plan includes a monthly allowance that resets on the 1st.
Yes. The intelligence engine is industry-agnostic — built explicitly to handle technology, finance, healthcare, law, FMCG, government, education, and construction roles. Skill categories, experience thresholds, and interview questions adapt to the role type and seniority level.
Resume data is processed through the Anthropic API (with Zero Data Retention) and stored in your isolated organisation database. We support GDPR Right to Erasure — candidates can be fully anonymised on request. Data is never shared across organisations.
The deterministic engine returns a complete scored analysis in under 100ms — parsing, skill evidence, fit score, timeline and risk. Deeper reasoning stages then run in parallel and take a further 20–30 seconds, with the final hiring intelligence synthesis adding 10–25 seconds. Total: 30–60 seconds for the full report, but you see a usable result immediately.

Looking for something more specific? Browse the full FAQ — 50+ answers on hiring, AI screening, security, and pricing.

Ready to hire smarter?

Start your 7-day free trial. No credit card. Every resume scored by the deterministic engine, with the evidence attached.